Author: Alexander M. Giles
Date: November 14, 2002
UNIFORMITY OF U.S. MARITIME LAW
Maritime Law Association of the U.S. - Uniformity Committee
UNIFORMITY LAW ARTICLE BIBLIOGRAPHY
Thomas R. Anderson, American Dredging Co. v. Miller: Clouding the Waters of Maritime
Litigation, 59 Alb. L. Rev. 1519 (1996)
James W. Bartlett, III, Recreational Boats: The Evolution of Jurisdiction and Choice of Law
Issues from the Constitution through the Calhoun Decisions, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 1247 (June,
David J. Bederman, The Future of Maritime Law in the Federal Courts: A Faculty Colloquium:
Admiralty Jurisdiction, 31 J. Mar. L & Com. 189 (April, 2000)
David J. Bederman, Uniformity, Delegation and the Dormant Admiralty Clause, 28 J. Mar. L. &
Com. 1 (January, 1997)
Lizabeth L. Burrell, Federal and Uniformity in Maritime Law: Application of State Law to
Maritime Claims: Is there a better guide than Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen?, 21 Mar.
Law. 53 (Winter, 1996)
Lizabeth L. Burrell, Uniformity of Maritime Law and the Supreme Court: Till Death Do Us Part,
25 Mar. Law. 153 (Winter, 2000)
Ugo Colella, Comment: The Proper Role of Special Solicitude in the General Maritime Law, 70
Tul. L. Rev. 227 (November, 1995)
Ugo Colella, Essay: The Secret Dissent in Yahama Motor Corp. v. Calhoun - Never Before
Published, 71 Tul. L. Rev. 203 (November, 1996)
Attilio M. Costabel, Maritime Law Uniformity and Federalism after Yahama V and DOSHA
Amendment: For Whom the Bell Tolls, 13 St. Thomas L. Rev. 445 (Winter 2001)
Barry Cushman, Lochner, Liquor and Longshoreman: a Puzzle in Progressive Era Federalism, 32
J. Mar. L. & Com. 1 (January, 2001)
W. Eugene Davis, The Role of Federal Courts in Admiralty: The Challenge Facing the
Admiralty Judges of the Lower Federal Courts, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 1355 (June, 2001)
Robert Force, An Essay on Federal Common Law and Admiralty, 43 St. Louis L. J. 1367 (Fall,
Robert Force, Choice of Law in Admiralty Cases: National Interests and the Admiralty Clause,
75 Tul. L. Rev. 1421 (June, 2001)
Robert Force, Deconstructing Jensen: Admiralty and Federalism in the Twenty-first Century:
The Nicholas J. Healy Lecture, 32 J. Mar. L. & Com. 517 (October, 2001)
Joel K. Goldstein, Federal Common Law in Admiralty: An Introduction to the Beginning of an
Exchange, 43 St. Louis L. J. 1337 (Fall, 1999)
Joel K. Goldstein, The Life and Times of Wilburn Boat: A Critical Guide (Part I), 28 J. Mar. L.
& Com. 395 (July, 1997)
Joel K. Goldstein, The Life and Times of Wilburn Boat: A Critical Guide (Part II), 28 J. Mar. L.
& Com. 555 (October, 1997)
Patrick J. S. Griggs, Uniformity of Maritime Law - An International Perspective, 73 Tul. L. Rev.
1551 (May/June, 1999)
Charles S. Haight, Jr., Babel Afloat: Some Reflections on Uniformity in Maritime Law, 28 J.
Mar. L. & Com. 189 (April 1997)
Lee A. Handford, Do Not Fear to Tread on Solid Ground: The Role of the Supreme Court in
Furthering Uniformity in Admiralty Law, 10 U.S.F. Mar. L. J. 235 (Summer 1998)
Major B. Harding, Judicial Decision-Making Analysis of Federalism Issues in Modern United
States Supreme Court Maritime Cases, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 1517 (June, 2001)
The Honorable Lynn N. Hughes, Federalism and Uniformity in Maritime Law: An Introduction:
Principles and Pragmatism, 21 Mar. Law. 1 (Winter, 1996)
Andrew L. Krueger, A New Course for Admiralty Uniformity: Yahama v. Calhoun and Maritime
Wrongful Death, 26 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 149 (1996)
Harvey J. Lewis, What Law is "Saved to Suitors" When a Maritime Tort Case is Filed in State
Court?, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 1687 (June, 2001)
Howard M. McCormack, Uniformity of Maritime Law, History, and Perspective from the U.S.
Point of View, 73 Tul. L. Rev. 1481 (May/June, 1999)
Gordon W. Paulson, Symposium on American and International Maritime Law: Comparative
Aspects of Court Importance: An Historical Overview of the Development of Uniformity
in International Maritime Law, 57 Tul. L. Rev. 1065 (June, 1983)
David W. Robertson, Displacement of State Law by Federal Maritime Law, 26 J. Mar. L. &
Com. 325 (July, 1995)
David W. Robertson, Federalism and Uniformity in Maritime Law: The Applicability of State
Law in Maritime Cases After Yahama Motor Corp. v. Calhoun, 21 Mar. Law. 81 (Winter,
J. B. Ruhl, Finding Federalism in the Admiralty: "The Devil's Own Mess" Revisited, 12 Mar.
Law. 263 (Spring, 1988)
Gary T. Sacks and Derrick S. Kirby, Case Note: Wrongful Death: Maritime Standards for
Liability to the Estates of Nonseafarers: Calhoun v. Yahama Motor Corp., 32 J. Mar. L.
& Com. 339 (April, 2001)
Thomas J. Schoenbaum, The Future of Maritime Law in the Federal Courts: A Faculty
Colloquium: Marine Insurance, 31 J. Mar. L. & Com. 281 (April, 2000)
C. Taylor Simpson, Sailing the Statutory Seas Toward Uniformity in Maritime Tort Law: Miles
v. Apex Marine Corp., 15 Tul. Mar. L. J. 449 (Spring 1991)
Michael F. Sturley, Restating the Law of Marine Insurance: A Workable Solution to the Wilburn
Boat Problem, 29 J. Mar. L. & Com. 41 (January, 1998)
Michael F. Sturley, Uniformity in the Law Governing the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 26 J.
Mar. L. & Com. 553 (October, 1995)
Steven R. Swanson, Federalism, the Admiralty, and Oil Spills, 27 J. Mar. L. & Com. 379 (July,
Steven R. Swanson, OPA '90 + 10: The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 After Ten Years, 32 J. Mar. L.
& Com. 135 (January, 2001)
Joseph P. Tabrisky, Recent Developments in Maritime Law: Changes in the Law Moving as
Rapidly as the Modern Day Personal Watercraft that Propel Them, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 1757
Michael F. Vitt, Stemming the Tide: Uniformity in Admiralty Commands No Recovery for
Recreational Vessel Losses Under a Marine Products Liability Theory in Maryland
Courts Due to the Economic Loss Rule of East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica
Delaval, Inc., 28 U. Balt. L. Rev. 423 (Spring 1999)
Donald M. Waesche, Marine Insurance: Choice and Uniformity of Law Generally, 66 Tul L.
Rev. 293 (December, 1991)
prepared by Alexander M. Giles, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland
Bibliography of law review articles on uniformity.